Osteoarthritis year in review 2023: Epidemiology & therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To highlight some important findings from osteoarthritis (OA) epidemiology and therapy research undertaken over the past year. METHODS: Search of MEDLINE and EMBASE databases between April 1, 2022 to March 3, 2023 using "exp *Osteoarthritis/" as the preliminary search term. The search was limited to articles published in English and including human subjects. Final inclusions were based on perceived importance and results that may inform improved identification of risk factors or OA treatments, as well as OA subgroups of potential relevance to risk factors or treatment approaches. RESULTS: 3182 studies were screened, leaving 208 eligible for inclusion. This narrative review of thirty-three selected studies was arranged into: a) OA predictors - population-based studies, b) Specific predictors of OA and OA outcome; c) Intra-articular injections, and d) OA phenotypes. There was some suggestion of sex differences in predictors of incidence or outcomes. Body mass index changes appear largely to affect knee OA outcomes. Evidence points to a lack of benefit of viscosupplementation in knee OA; findings were variable for other injectables. Studies of OA phenotypes reveal potentially relevant clinical and pathophysiological differences. CONCLUSIONS: Identifying risk factors for the incidence/progression of OA represents an ongoing and important area of OA research. Sex may play a role in this understanding and bears consideration and further study. For knee injectables other than viscosupplementation, additional high-quality trials appear warranted. Continued investigation and application of phenotyping across the OA disease, illness and care spectrum may be key to developing disease-modifying agents and their appropriate selection for individuals.

Effectiveness of double-puncture temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis with viscosupplementation in different categories of severity - a prospective study.

This 3-year prospective study evaluated the efficacy of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) arthrocentesis with viscosupplementation in different severity stages based on the Dimitroulis classification (categories 2-4 were included). TMJ arthrocentesis was performed under local anaesthesia, and the protocol consisted of a double-puncture technique with lavage of ≥150 cc Ringer Lactate plus viscosupplementation. Incobotulinum toxin A was administered 10-15 days preoperatively in patients with concomitant masticatory myalgia. The primary outcome was TMJ pain, assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS, 0-10), and the secondary outcomes were the maximum mouth opening (MMO, mm) and myalgia degree (0-3). All outcomes were assessed on the intervention day (T0) and after the procedure (T1) (minimum 1 month and then 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and every year since). A total of 108 patients were enrolled (mean age of 43.1 ± 18.9 years); 86 (80%) were women and 22 (20%) were men. Preoperative pain was 4.02 ± 3.12 (mean ± SD), MMO was 38.10 ± 9.56 (mean ± SD) and myalgia degree was 1.80 ± 1.18 (mean ± SD). After an average of 215.4 days (31-1253 days), a statistically significant improvement of pain (P < 0.0001), MMO (P = 0.005) and myalgia degree (P < 0.0001) was observed. The overall successful outcome of TMJ arthrocentesis with viscosupplementation was 76%. The authors observed increased arthrocentesis effectiveness and success rate with viscosupplementation in Dimitroulis category 2 (88.6%) compared to 3-4 (71.4%). An association was found between arthrocentesis with viscosupplementation failure and painful myalgia (ρ = 0.477; P < 0.0001). Thirteen patients (12%) underwent a second TMJ intervention after finalising the present trial. With a low complication rate, TMJ arthrocentesis with viscosupplementation led to an overall benefit for all the included patients. This study reinforces the important role of minimally invasive TMJ arthrocentesis as a first treatment option, with better results in the early stages compared to more severe stages.

Manejo das disfunções temporomandibulares. Parte I: tratamento conservador / Management of temporomandibular joint disorders. Part I: conservative treatment

Objetivo: Apresentar as modalidades de tratamentos conservadoras e minimamente invasivas mais usadas disponíveis no arsenal terapêutico das desordens temporomandibulares (DTM). Revisão da literatura: Os objetivos do tratamento invariavelmente incluem redução da dor, diminuição das atividades parafuncionais e restauração da função. Dentre as alternativas conservadoras e minimamente invasivas, podemos citar os dispositivos interoclusais, exercícios terapêuticos, eletrofototermoterapia, agulhamento seco e infiltração de anestésicos locais em pontos gatilho, injeção de sangue autógeno para controle da luxação mandibular, terapia cognitivo comportamental, toxina botulínica, viscossuplementação, controle farmacológico da dor aguda e crônica. As DTMs afetam uma proporção significativa da população. Somente após o fracasso das opções não invasivas é que devem ser iniciados tratamentos mais invasivos e irreversíveis. No entanto, algumas condições, como a anquilose e neoplasias, por exemplo, são essencialmente tratadas cirurgicamente e tentativas de tratamentos conservadores podem trazer piora na qualidade de vida ou risco de morte. Considerações finais: Uma abordagem de equipe multidisciplinar para o manejo é essencial no cuidado fundamental de todos os pacientes com DTM, para que o tratamento possa ser especificamente adaptado às necessidades individuais do paciente.

Aim: To present the most widely used conservative and minimally invasive treatment modalities available in the therapeutic arsenal for temporomandibular disorders (TMD). Literature review: Treatment goals invariably include pain reduction, reduction of parafunctional activities and restoration of function. Among the conservative and minimally invasive alternatives, we can mention interocclusal devices, therapeutic exercises, electrophototherapy, dry needling and infiltration of local anesthetics in trigger points, autogenous blood injection to control mandibular dislocation, cognitive behavioral therapy, botulinum toxin, viscosupplementation, pharmacological control of acute and chronic pain. TMD affects a considerable proportion of the population. Only after non-invasive options have failed should more invasive and irreversible treatments be initiated. However, some conditions, such as ankylosis and neoplasms, for example, are treated surgically and attempts at conservative treatments can lead to worsening quality of life or risk of death. Conclusions: A multidisciplinary team approach to management is essential in the fundamental care of all TMD patients, so that treatment can be specifically tailored to the patient's individual needs.

Injectable Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogel Containing Platelet Derivatives for Synovial Fluid Viscosupplementation and Growth Factors Delivery.

Osteoarthritisis a highly prevalent musculoskeletal disorder characterized by degradation of cartilage and synovial fluid (SF). Platelet derivatives as platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and platelet lysate have great potential in the treatment of osteoarthritis because they contain biologically active substances including growth factors (GFs). Rapid release of GFs and their short biological half-life are factors that can limit the therapeutic impact of PRP therapy. Herein, the first work that describes hydrogels based on polyaldehyde derivative of hyaluronic acid (HA-OX) as carriers of platelet derivatives for in situ applications is presented, which can be a possible solution to the problem. HA-OX hydrogels containing 50% (w/w) of PRP or platelet lysate can be injected using a syringe due to low viscosity(<10 Pa s) and injection force (<20 N), and reach elastic modulus up to 2000 Pa. Insulin-like GF-1 and Platelet-derived GF-AB release from HA-OX hydrogels (mesh size 297-406 nm) by Fickian and non-Fickian diffusion respectively. The released PRP GFs maintain their ability to induce cell proliferation (87%-92%). Based on the obtained results, the unique concept of a new material that can restore viscoelastic properties of SF and at the same time gradually deliver GFs from platelet derivatives is designed.

The Use of Intra-articular Platelet-Rich Plasma as a Therapeutic Intervention for Hip Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: There is a cohort of patients in whom hip preservation surgery is not indicated, because they have developed signs of early osteoarthritis (OA), and nor can they have a hip replacement, as they are too early in the disease process. Management of this cohort of patients is not standardised and both pharmacological and nonpharmacological measures are utilised to reduce pain. Interventions available for early OA include intra-articular injections of steroids, viscosupplementation and more recently platelet-rich plasma (PRP). However, the use of PRP in hip OA has not yet been studied systematically. PURPOSE: To assess intra-articular PRP as a therapeutic intervention for hip OA, including the duration of efficacy, influence of dose and composition of PRP, and the incidence of adverse effects. STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: We performed literature searches on the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, WEB OF SCIENCE, COCHRANE, and SCOPUS databases, and the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were followed. Data were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. We assessed the quality of the included studies using the methodological index for non-randomized studies instrument, with an additional assessment for randomized controlled trials with the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials. This is the first study to concisely collate the available data on the use of PRP in hip OA. RESULTS: Eight studies were included in the analysis, with data from a total of 331 patients. PRP significantly reduced pain compared with the baseline at multiple time points, with the greatest effect at the 1- to 2-month follow-up, but PRP significantly improved function only at the 1- to 2-month follow-up. A significantly larger reduction in pain was achieved with a single injection of PRP compared with multiple injections, a total injected dose of PRP <15 mL compared with ≥15 mL, and use of a leukocyte-poor PRP preparation compared with leukocyte-rich PRP. There were no lasting adverse effects. CONCLUSION: Low- and moderate-quality evidence suggests that PRP reduces pain and improves function at the end-point follow-up of studies compared with the baseline. Moderate-quality evidence suggests that a larger reduction in pain is achieved with a single injection of PRP compared with multiple injections, and low-quality evidence attributes a larger reduction of pain with a total injected dose of PRP <15 mL compared with ≥15 mL and using leukocyte-poor PRP compared with leukocyte-rich PRP.

EUROVISCO Good Practice Recommendations for a First Viscosupplementation in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis.

RATIONALE: Viscosupplementation (VS) with hyaluronic acid is widely used in the management of knee osteoarthritis. There is no clear recommendation on the decision-making to achieve VS. DESIGN: Based on extensive research of the literature and expert opinion, the members of the EUROVISCO (European Viscosupplementation Consensus Group) task force were asked to give their degree of agreement with 60 issues, using a Delphi method. RESULTS: The expert panel achieved unanimous agreement in favor of the following statements: It is recommended to assess pain on a visual or 10-point numeric scale before considering VS. VS can be considered for patients with pain scores between 3 and 8. A standard x-ray must be obtained before the decision of VS. If the x-ray is normal, osteoarthritis must be confirmed by MRI or computed tomography (CT) arthrogram before considering VS. The aims of VS are relieving pain, improving function, and reducing non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) consumption. The use of VS must not be considered for treating an osteoarthritis flare. VS can be envisaged as a first-line pharmacological treatment in patients having a contra-indication to NSAIDs or analgesics. VS can be considered in patients with contra-indications to arthroplasty. In the case of severe comorbidities (diabetes, hypertension, gastrointestinal disorders, renal failure), VS can avoid the use of potentially dangerous treatments. VS can be considered in patients receiving antiplatelet agents, vitamin K antagonists, and direct factor Xa or thrombin inhibitors. Five other statements obtained a high level of consensus. CONCLUSION: These recommendations, illustrated in a decision algorithm, have been established to help practitioners in the decision-making of knee VS.

The Association between Radiographic Features and the Duration of Effectiveness of a Single Injection of Extended-Release Hyaluronic Acid (HANOX-M-XL) in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: Preliminary Results of a Prospective Trial.

BACKGROUND: Advanced radiological stage of knee osteoarthritis (OA) is predictive of poor response to viscosupplementation (VS). To date, the impact of x-ray features on the duration of effectiveness (DE) of VS has not been investigated. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the radiological features associated with DE of VS in patients with knee OA. METHODS: Cross-sectional study in patients with knee OA treated with 1 injection of cross-linked hyaluronic acid (HA). The primary outcome was DE, self-assessed by the patients in weeks of effectiveness. Radiological features (joint space narrowing-JSN topography and Kellgren-Lawrence [K-L] grade) associated with DE were studied. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients-33 females (76 knees)-were analyzed. The average DE was 52.0 (24.7) weeks (range, 13-155 weeks). In the bivariate analysis, DE was 14 weeks longer in those with K-L grades 1 and 2 (62.6 ± 36.4 weeks) than in those with K-L 3 and 4 (48.9 ± 18.6) (P = 0.03). DE was not significantly different according to the involved compartment(s). It was significantly longer in men than in women (60 ± 31.4 vs. 47 ± 16 weeks; P = 0.035). In multivariate analysis, K-L grade (1-2 vs. 3-4) (P = 0.007), male gender (0.02), and older age (0.04) were independently associated with a longer DE. CONCLUSION: DE of a single injection of extended-release HA is longer in K-L 1-2 than in K-L 3-4 OA knees, regardless of the JSN topography. However, even the patients with more advanced OA benefited from HANOX-M-XL injection for an average duration barely less than 1 year.

Viscosupplementation for knee osteoarthritis: systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of viscosupplementation for pain and function in patients with knee osteoarthritis. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. DATA SOURCES: Searches were conducted of Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases from inception to 11 September 2021. Unpublished trials were identified from the grey literature and trial registries. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR STUDY SELECTION: Randomised trials comparing viscosupplementation with placebo or no intervention for knee osteoarthritis treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The prespecified primary outcome was pain intensity. Secondary outcomes were function and serious adverse events. Pain and function were analysed as standardised mean differences (SMDs). The prespecified minimal clinically important between group difference was -0.37 SMD. Serious adverse events were analysed as relative risks. METHODS: Two reviewers independently extracted relevant data and assessed the risk of bias of trials using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. The predefined main analysis was based only on large, placebo controlled trials with ≥100 participants per group. Summary results were obtained through a random effects meta-analysis model. Cumulative meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis under a random effects model were also performed. RESULTS: 169 trials provided data on 21 163 randomised participants. Evidence of small study effects and publication biases was observed for pain and function (Egger's tests with P<0.001 and asymmetric funnel plots). Twenty four large, placebo controlled trials (8997 randomised participants) included in the main analysis of pain indicated that viscosupplementation was associated with a small reduction in pain intensity compared with placebo (SMD -0.08, 95% confidence interval -0.15 to -0.02), with the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval excluding the minimal clinically important between group difference. This effect corresponds to a difference in pain scores of -2.0 mm (95% confidence interval -3.8 to -0.5 mm) on a 100 mm visual analogue scale. Trial sequential analysis for pain indicated that since 2009 there has been conclusive evidence of clinical equivalence between viscosupplementation and placebo. Similar conclusions were obtained for function. Based on 15 large, placebo controlled trials on 6462 randomised participants, viscosupplementation was associated with a statistically significant higher risk of serious adverse events than placebo (relative risk 1.49, 95% confidence interval 1.12 to 1.98). CONCLUSION: Strong conclusive evidence indicates that viscosupplementation leads to a small reduction in knee osteoarthritis pain compared with placebo, but the difference is less than the minimal clinically important between group difference. Strong conclusive evidence indicates that viscosupplementation is also associated with an increased risk of serious adverse events compared with placebo. The findings do not support broad use of viscosupplementation for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42021236894.

Viscosupplementation in the upper and lower compartments of the temporomandibular joint checked by ultrasonography in an ex vivo and in vivo study.

Viscosupplementation (VS) of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) aims to treat temporomandibular dysfunction (TMD) by stimulating synovial cells to improve intracapsular lubrication. The purpose of the present study was to assess a VS protocol planned with the aid of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and checked by ultrasonography (US). The study was carried out in 3 stages. The first was to check the correspondence between the proposed facial reference points and the osseous components of the joint by means of CBCT. In the second stage, the upper and lower compartments of 20 TMJs of fresh frozen cadavers were injected with coloured liquids, and the accuracy of the technique was confirmed by dissecting the anatomical specimens. The third stage consisted of VS in 10 patients (20 TMJs), with real-time verification of the location of the needle tip by means of ultrasonography. CBCT confirmed the correct locations of the marked points used in the proposed VS protocol. The dissections showed that 13 of the 14 injections effectively reached the upper and lower compartments. The location of the needle tip was effectively verified by ultrasonography, confirming the correct access to both compartments. The proposed protocol was effective for accessing the upper and lower compartments of the TMJ. The evaluated protocol proved to be accurate, safe and clinically reproducible means of VS in the upper and lower compartments of the TMJ.

Intra-articular 2.5% polyacrylamide hydrogel, a new concept in the medication of equine osteoarthritis: A review.

Recent clinical and experimental trials have demonstrated that intra-articular 2.5% Polyacrylamide hydrogel (PAAG) is highly effective (82.5% free of lameness horses at 2 year follow-up), lasting and safe for the treatment of equine osteoarthritis (OA). Over the last decade, intra-articular 2.5% PAAG has shown to be a potent and promising drug in the medication of OA in horses, as no other single medical treatment for OA has such prolonged efficacy. Most of these studies were presenting some limitations. Preliminary observations on the mechanisms of action of intra-articular 2.5% PAAG support a mechanical effect through integration into the synovial membrane, an increase in joint elasticity possibly reducing overall joint capsule stiffness, and provision of lasting viscosupplementation which contributes to protecting articular surfaces. In addition, no effects on pro-inflammatory cytokines have been observed. Studies also suggest that these positive effects occur in the absence of intra-articular neurotoxicity or fibrosis. The effect on the synovial membrane and joint capsule and the long-acting viscosupplementation represent new concepts in the management of equine OA. Horse; Osteoarthritis, Medication, 2.5% polyacrylamide hydrogel.

Analysis of micro-costing through the Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing (TDABC) method in viscosupplementation procedures in different application regimens / Análise do microcusteio por meio de método Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing (TDABC) nos procedimentos de viscossuplementação do joelho em diferentes regimes de aplicação

Objective: To evaluate the micro-costing of viscosupplementation procedures compared to different infiltration regimens. Methods: This study compared, through the Time-Driven ActivityBased Costing method, the micro-costing of these different application regimens using national cost averages as a basis for calculation in a medium-sized outpatient service. Results: The results demonstrated that the difference in costs with the single application is 31.47% less for three and 119.13% for five applications. Conclusions: No study showed a superiority of the five-application regimen over the three-application regimen, which leads one to believe that there is no justification for this procedure from an economic or quality-of-life point of view.

Objective: Avaliar o microcusteio dos procedimentos de viscossuplementação do joelho em diferentes regimes de aplicação. Métodos: Este estudo comparou, por meio do método Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing, o microcusteio desses diferentes regimes de aplicação, usando com base de cálculo médias nacionais de custo em um serviço ambulatorial de porte médio. Resultados: Os resultados encontrados demonstraram que a diferença nos custos com a aplicação única é 31,47% menor para três aplicações e 119,13% para cinco aplicações. Conclusão: Em nenhum estudo houve superioridade do regime de cinco aplicações ao regime de três, fato que leva a acreditar que não há nenhuma justificativa para esse procedimento do ponto de vista econômico ou de qualidade de vida do paciente.

Co-formulations of adalimumab with hyaluronic acid/polyvinylpyrrolidone to combine intraarticular drug delivery and viscosupplementation.

Polymer-based formulations present an attractive strategy in intraarticular drug-delivery to refrain biologicals from early leakage from the joint. In this study, co-formulations of hyaluronic acid and polyvinylpyrrolidone were investigated for their potential as viscosupplements and their influence on the transsynovial loss of adalimumab. For this purpose, polymer mixtures were evaluated for their viscosity and elasticity behavior while their influence on the permeation of adalimumab across a porcine ex-vivo synovial membrane was determined. Hyaluronic acid showed strong shear thinning behavior and exhibited high viscosity and elasticity at low motions, while combinations with polyvinylpyrrolidone provided absorption and stiffness at high mechanical stress, so that they can potentially restore the rheological properties of the synovial fluid over the range of joint motion. In addition, the formulations showed significant influence on transsynovial permeation kinetics of adalimumab and hyaluronic acid, which could be decelerated up to 5- and 3-fold, respectively. Besides viscosity effects, adalimumab was retained primarily by an electrostatic interaction with hyaluronic acid, as detected by isothermal calibration calorimetry. Furthermore, polymer-mediated stabilization of the antibody activity was detected. In summary, hyaluronic acid - polyvinylpyrrolidone combinations can be efficiently used to prolong the residence of adalimumab in the joint cavity while simultaneously supplying viscosupplementation.

A composite device for viscosupplementation treatment resistant to degradation by reactive oxygen species and hyaluronidase.

Osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the most common musculoskeletal disorders in the world. OA is often associated with the loss of viscoelastic and tribological properties of synovial fluid (SF) due to degradation of hyaluronic acid (HA) by reactive oxygen species (ROS) and hyaluronidases. Viscosupplementation is one of the ways how to effectively restore SF functions. However, current viscosupplementation products provide only temporal therapeutic effect because of short biological half-life. In this article we describe a novel device for viscosupplementation (NV) based on the cross-linked tyramine derivative of HA, chondroitin sulfate (CS), and high molecular weight HA by online determination of viscoelastic properties loss during degradation by ROS and hyaluronidase. Rheological and tribological properties of developed viscosupplement were compared with HA solutions with different molecular weights in the range 500-2000 kDa, which are currently commonly used as medical devices for viscosupplementation treatment. Moreover, based on clinical practice and scientific literature all samples were also diluted by model OA SF in the ratio 1:1 (vol/vol) to better predict final properties after injection to the joint. The observed results confirmed that NV exhibits appropriate rheological properties (viscosity, elastic, and viscous moduli) comparable with healthy SF and maintain them during degradation for a significantly longer time than HA solutions with molecular weight in the range 500-2000 kDa and cross-linked material without CS.

The efficacy of intraarticular viscosupplementation after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of viscosupplementation after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy. METHOD: A randomized controlled trial of 47 patients who underwent arthroscopic partial meniscectomy was conducted between March 2020 and March 2021. Patients were randomized into two groups: a viscosupplementation group (n = 23) and a control group (n = 24). A single-dose intraarticular hyaluronic acid injection was used as viscosupplementation. The 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain assessment was measured at baseline and at 1 day, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months post-surgery. The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Tegner, Lysholm, and Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores and range of motion (ROM) of the knee were measured at baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months. RESULTS: The 100 mm VAS score for pain was significantly lower in the viscosupplementation group at 2 weeks post-surgery (27.5 mm vs. 40.7 mm, P = 0.047). ROM was significantly greater in the viscosupplementation group than in the control group at 2 weeks (131.5° vs. 121.0°, P = 0.044) post-surgery. No significant differences were observed in the IKDC or in the Tegner, Lysholm, and WOMAC scores between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Viscosupplementation after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy significantly reduced pain at 2 weeks post-surgery and improved ROM of the knee at 2 weeks post-surgery. There might be some benefits in terms of pain and functional recovery of viscosupplementation after arthroscopic surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This randomized controlled trial was registered at cris.nih.go.kr # KCT0004921 .

Évaluation du SynviscMD et du Synvisc-OneMD dans le cadre de la prise en charge de l'arthrose du genou / Evaluation of Synvisc® and Synvisc-One® in the management of knee osteoarthritis

MANDAT: L'Institut national d'excellence en santé et en services sociaux (INESSS) a reçu le mandat du Bureau de l'innovation de produire un avis sur la pertinence d'inclure les produits SynviscMD et Synvisc-OneMD au sein de la couverture du régime public pour les patients atteints d'arthrose du genou. DÉMARCHE D'ÉVALUATION: Une revue des données issues de la littérature et de celles fournies par le fabricant a été réalisée afin de documenter l'efficacité, l'innocuité et l'efficience des produits SynviscMD et Synvisc-OneMD. Des données expérientielles et contextuelles issues de la consultation d'experts sont aussi présentées. De plus, la perspective de patients atteints d'arthrose du genou a été obtenue au moyen d'un questionnaire élaboré par l'INESSS et diffusé par la Société de l'arthrite. BESOIN DE SANTÉ: La prévalence de l'arthrose du genou s'établit à environ 4,0 % dans la population québécoise âgée de plus de 20 ans. La nature évolutive de cette maladie a des répercussions grandissantes sur la qualité de vie des patients, leur fonctionnalité et leur autonomie. Il n'existe actuellement pas de traitement curatif pour l'arthrose. La prise en charge vise à soulager les symptômes et à maintenir une certaine fonctionnalité et consiste en l'utilisation concomitante de divers modes d'intervention. Toutefois, celle-ci ne permet de combler que partiellement les besoins de santé et une minorité de traitements sont accessibles ou couverts par le système de santé publique. Certains enjeux d'équité d'accès se posent dans la mesure où des patients n'ayant pas de moyens financiers ou d'assurances privées ont accès à moins d'options de traitements et de services. Certains patients peuvent donc se retrouver dans une impasse thérapeutique pendant plusieurs années, ce qui peut grandement affecter leur qualité de vie. PRODUITS EN ÉVALUATION: Les produits SynviscMD et Synvisc-OneMD sont des agents de viscosupplémentation identiques qui se distinguent par leur régime d'administration, soit par injection intraarticulaire à raison de 3 injections de 2 ml à intervalle d'une semaine pour SynviscMD ou d'une seule injection de 6 ml pour Synvisc-OneMD. SynviscMD et Synvisc-OneMD sont des options de traitement de l'arthrose depuis 22 et 12 ans respectivement, et disponibles au Québec pour plusieurs indications, y compris l'arthrose du genou, la coxarthrose, l'arthrose de la cheville et de l'épaule. Les experts mentionnent que le Synvisc-OneMD serait majoritairement utilisé par rapport au SynviscMD, notamment pour limiter le nombre d'injections. La viscosupplémentation pour le traitement de l'arthrose du genou avait déjà fait l'objet d'une évaluation en 2007 par l'Agence d'évaluation des technologies et des modes d'intervention en santé (AETMIS). L'agence avait conclu que, compte tenu de l'efficacité modeste de cette modalité thérapeutique par rapport au placébo, de son coût relativement élevé et des ressources professionnelles additionnelles nécessaires pour l'administrer, il n'était pas alors justifié d'envisager le financement public de la viscosuppléance pour l'ensemble des patients souffrant de gonarthrose au Québec.

Bone marrow aspirate concentrate injections provide similar results versus viscosupplementation up to 24 months of follow-up in patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. A randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this double-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to compare clinical improvement and radiographic findings up to 2 years of follow-up of a single intra-articular injection of bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) versus hyaluronic acid (HA) for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA). The hypothesis was that BMAC injection could lead to better clinical and radiographic results compared to viscosupplementation. METHODS: Patients with bilateral knee OA were randomized to one intra-articular injection of tibial-derived BMAC in one knee and one HA injection in the contralateral knee. Sixty patients were enrolled, and 56 were studied up to the final follow-up (35 men, 21 women, mean age 57.8 ± 8.9 years), for a total of 112 knees. Patients were evaluated before the injection and at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months with the IKDC subjective score, VAS for pain, and the KOOS score. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID), patient treatment judgement, and adverse events were documented, as well as bilateral X-Rays (Rosenberg view) before and after treatment. RESULTS: No severe adverse events nor differences were reported in terms of mild adverse events (7.1% vs 5.4%, p = ns) and treatment failures (10.7% vs 12.5%, p = ns) in BMAC and HA groups, respectively. The IKDC subjective score improved from baseline to all follow-ups for BMAC (p < 0.0005), while it improved up to 12 months (p < 0.0005) and then decreased at 24 months (p = 0.030) for HA. Compared to HA, BMAC showed a higher improvement for VAS pain at 12 (2.2 ± 2.6 vs 1.7 ± 2.5, p = 0.041) and 24 months (2.2 ± 2.6 vs 1.4 ± 2.8, p = 0.002). The analysis based on OA severity confirmed this difference only in Kellgren-Lawrence 1-2 knees, while comparable results were observed in moderate/severe OA. Radiographic evaluation did not show knee OA deterioration for both treatment groups, without intergroup differences. CONCLUSION: BMAC did not demonstrate a clinically significant superiority at short-term compared to viscosupplementation, reporting overall comparable results in terms of clinical scores, failures, adverse events, radiographic evaluation, MCID achievement, and patient treatment judgment. However, while HA results decreased over time, BMAC presented more durable results in mild OA knees. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I.

Viscosuplementación con ácido hialurónico de alto peso molecular doblemente reticulado en el tratamiento de la artrosis de rodilla. Estudio de su eficacia y seguridad / Viscosupplementation with hyaluronic acid with double cross-linked high molecular weight in knee osteoarthritis

Objetivos: La osteoartrosis (OA) es una artropatía incurable mono o poliarticular. En la rodilla es la enfermedad degenerativa más común, con gran incidencia de los factores mecánicos. El arsenal terapéutico para el manejo de la OA de rodilla (OAR) comprende medidas no farmacológicas, farmacológicas, medicación de técnicas intraarticulares y cirugía. Los objetivos de este trabajo fueron evaluar la eficacia en términos de dolor, función articular y calidad de vida de los pacientes infiltrados con ácido hialurónico (AH) de alto peso molecular (PM), doblemente reticulado (Cientific Synovial®, en adelante: CS) así como la seguridad de su uso. Adicionalmente se intentó objetivar el tiempo libre de prótesis en pacientes con esta indicación. Materiales y métodos: Se efectuó un diseño pre y post (un solo grupo) para pacientes con gonartrosis. Se analizó una muestra de cuarenta y seis pacientes (n = 46) a quienes se dividió en dos grupos según clasificación de Kellgren-Lawrence (KL). Un grupo KL 1­2 fue infiltrado con AH 40 mg (CS40), y otro grupo KL 3­4 fue infiltrado con AH 60 mg (CS60). A todos los pacientes se les suministró el cuestionario KOOS-12 (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) pre y postinfiltración y se efectuó estadística descriptiva e inferencial apropiada. Conclusiones: el AH de alto PM y doblemente reticulado (Cientific Synovial®) mejoró estadística y clínicamente todos los parámetros de eficacia analizados por medio del cuestionario KOOS-12. El preparado se mostró seguro y sin aparición de efectos adversos de relevancia. Tanto en los pacientes con indicación previa de reemplazo total de rodilla (RTR) rechazada (n = 12) como en el resto de los pacientes de la muestra se verificó la supervivencia libre de prótesis hasta el final del estudio

Objectives: Osteoarthrosis (OA) is an incurable mono or polyarticular arthropathy and in the knee it is the most common degenerative disease with a high incidence of mechanical factors. The therapeutic arsenal for the management of knee OA (OAR) includes non-pharmacological and pharmacological measures, medication and intra-articular techniques, and surgery. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the efficacy in terms of pain, joint function and quality of life of patients infiltrated with double cross-linked high molecular weight (MW) hyaluronic acid (HA) (Cientific Synovial®, ­CS­) as well as the safety of its use. Additionally, we tried to objectify the prosthesis-free time in patients with this indication. Materials and methods: a pre - post design (single group) was carried out for patients with knee osteoarthritis. A sample of fortysix patients (n = 46) was analyzed who were divided into two groups according to the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) classification. A group KL 1­2 was infiltrated with HA 40 mg (CS40) and another group KL 3­4 was infiltrated with HA 60 mg (CS60). All patients filled out the KOOS-12 questionnaire (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) pre and post infiltration and appropriate descriptive and inferential statistics were performed. Conclusions: The double-crosslinked, high-MW HA (Cientific Synovial®) improved statistically and clinically all the efficacy parameters analyzed using the KOOS-12 questionnaire. The preparation was shown to be safe and without the appearance of significant adverse effects. Both in the patients with a previous indication for total knee replacement (TKR) rejected (n = 12), as in the rest of the patients in the sample, prosthesis-free survival was verified until the end of the study

Inyección intrarticular única ecoguiada de ácido hialurónico en la coxartrosis sintomática: estudio retrospectivo de la eficacia de dos presentaciones / Single eco-guided intra-articular injection of hyaluronic acid in symptomatic coxarthrosis: retrospective study of the efficacy of two presentations

Introducción: La viscosuplementación ecoguiada con ácido hialurónico en la coxartrosis sintomática se ha extendido como tratamiento seguro con eficacia demostrada, aunque con falta de consenso en su uso como práctica habitual. Pocos estudios han comparado la eficacia de dos productos de inyección única. Objetivo: Evaluar la eficacia en pacientes infiltrados con dos ácidos hialurónicos de inyección única comparando Adant One® (A) a seis meses con Hyalone® (H) anual.Material y método: Estudio observacional retrospectivo sobre cohorte de pacientes con coxartrosis sintomática, tratados mediante viscosuplementación intrarticular ecoguiada de cadera con dos tipos de inyección única de ácido hialurónico. Su eficacia fue evaluada de acuerdo con las escalas WOMAC y EVA a los 6 y 12 meses. Resultados: Fueron tratados 144 pacientes con una dosis única de A y 84 con H. A los 6 meses aquellos tratados con A mostraron mejoras en relación con disminución del dolor en la EVA (p < 0,001) y en el WOMAC dolor (p = 0,003), así como en WOMAC global (p = 0,027). No hubo cambios en WOMAC rigidez y función. A los 12 meses los tratados con H mostraron mejorías en los parámetros EVA (p < 0,001) y WOMAC global (p = 0,010) y en todas sus dimensiones de manera significativa. Conclusiones: Una inyección única de H anual fue más efectiva para mejorar el dolor y la funcionalidad de la cadera con artrosis a 1 año comparado con A semestral. Es posible establecer protocolos anuales de viscosuplementación para la artrosis de cadera con ácido hialurónico usando H.(AU)

Introduction: Ultrasound-guided viscosupplementation with hyaluronic acid in symptomatic hip osteoarthritis is widely used as a safe treatment with proven efficacy, although there is a lack of consensus on its use as routine practice. Few studies have compared the efficacy of two single injection products. Objetive: To evaluate the efficacy in infiltrated patients with two single injection hyaluronic acids comparing Adant One® (A) at six months with annual Hyalone® (H).Material and method: Restrospective observational study on a cohort of patients with symptomatic hip osteoarthritis, treated by ultrasound-guided intra-articular viscossuplementation with two types of single injection of hyaluronic acid. Its efficacy was evaluated according to the WOMAC and VAS scales at 6 and 12 months. Results: 144 patients were treated with a single dose of A and 84 with H. At 6 months, those treated with A showed improvements in relation to pain reduction in the VAS (p < 0.001) and in the WOMAC pain (p = 0.003), as well as in global WOMAC (p = 0.027). There were no changes in WOMAC stiffness and function. At 12 months, those treated with H showed significant improvements in the VAS (p < 0.001) and global WOMAC (p = 0.010) parameters and in all their dimensions. Conclusions: A single injection of annual H was more effective in improving pain and function of the hip with osteoarthritis at 1 year compared to A at 6 months. It is possible to establish annual viscossuplementation protocols for hip osteoarthritis with hyaluronic acid using H.(AU)

Non-clinical assessment of lubrication and free radical scavenging of an innovative non-animal carboxymethyl chitosan biomaterial for viscosupplementation: An in-vitro and ex-vivo study.

OBJECTIVE: Lubrication and free radical scavenging are key features of biomaterials used for viscosupplementation (VS) of joints affected by osteoarthritis (OA). The objective of this study was to describe the non-clinical performance characterization of KiOmedine® CM-Chitosan, a non-animal carboxymethyl chitosan, in order to assess its intended action in VS and to compare it to existing viscosupplements based on crosslinked hyaluronan (HA) formulations. METHOD: The lubrication capacity of the tested viscosupplements (VS) was evaluated in-vitro and ex-vivo. In-vitro, the coefficient of friction (COF) was measured using a novel tribological system. Meanwhile, an ex-vivo biomechanical model in ovine hindlimbs was developed to assess the recovery of join mobility after an intra-articular (IA) injection. Free radical scavenging capacity of HA and KiOmedine® CM-Chitosan formulations was evaluated using the Trolox Equivalent Antioxidant Capacity (TEAC) assay. RESULTS: In the in-vitro tribological model, KiOmedine® CM-Chitosan showed high lubrication capacity with a significant COF reduction than crosslinked HA formulations. In the ex-vivo model, the lubrication effect of KiOmedine® CM-Chitosan following an IA injection in the injured knee was proven again by a COF reduction. The recovery of joint motion was optimal with an IA injection of 3 ml of KiOmedine® CM-Chitosan, which was significantly better than the crosslinked HA formulation at the same volume. In the in-vitro TEAC assay, KiOmedine® CM-Chitosan showed a significantly higher free radical scavenging capacity than HA formulations. CONCLUSION: Overall, the results provide a first insight into the mechanism of action in terms of lubrication and free radical scavenging for the use of KiOmedine® CM-Chitosan as a VS treatment of OA. KiOmedine® CM-Chitosan demonstrated a higher capacity to scavenge free radicals, and it showed a higher recovery of mobility after a knee lesion than crosslinked HA formulations. This difference could be explained by the difference in chemical structure between KiOmedine® CM-Chitosan and HA and their formulations.